<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kelsey Dodges Opportunity to Grandstand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vibincblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vibincblog.com/?p=1615</link>
	<description>New and Improved in it&#039;s sameness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:00:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Lot About Nothing Much &#8211; Newscoma</title>
		<link>http://www.vibincblog.com/?p=1615&#038;cpage=1#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator>A Lot About Nothing Much &#8211; Newscoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vibincblog.com/?p=1615#comment-654</guid>
		<description>[...] like to be on the road for weeks on end either. If you are in Memphis, let me tell you something. A debate between Adrienne Pakis-Gillon and Brian Kelsey would be a good thing. As Democrats, do we really want this thing to go down without a fight? I say [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like to be on the road for weeks on end either. If you are in Memphis, let me tell you something. A debate between Adrienne Pakis-Gillon and Brian Kelsey would be a good thing. As Democrats, do we really want this thing to go down without a fight? I say [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie</title>
		<link>http://www.vibincblog.com/?p=1615&#038;cpage=1#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vibincblog.com/?p=1615#comment-653</guid>
		<description>The League of Women Voters is a liberal organization that supported ObamaCare.  Obamacare is a way for the government to take over our health care, so anyone who says that the League would have been nonpartisan does not know their facts.  An organization cannot claim to be nonpartisan and then support a liberal idea, such as Obamacare.  The League would have wanted to advocate their liberal agenda if Kelsey and Pakis-Gillon had debated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The League of Women Voters is a liberal organization that supported ObamaCare.  Obamacare is a way for the government to take over our health care, so anyone who says that the League would have been nonpartisan does not know their facts.  An organization cannot claim to be nonpartisan and then support a liberal idea, such as Obamacare.  The League would have wanted to advocate their liberal agenda if Kelsey and Pakis-Gillon had debated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.vibincblog.com/?p=1615&#038;cpage=1#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vibincblog.com/?p=1615#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Your puzzlement could perhaps have been answered had you read the  &lt;a&gt;&lt;i&gt;Flyer&lt;/i&gt; report (which appeared first, btw). You might discern the elements of what you would call a &quot;stunt&quot; there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your puzzlement could perhaps have been answered had you read the  <a><i>Flyer</i> report (which appeared first, btw). You might discern the elements of what you would call a &#8220;stunt&#8221; there.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
